GRE verbal practice is an essential part of your GRE prep! Read on for 22 GRE verbal reasoning practice questions, covering the question formats, types, and difficulty levels you’ll see on test day.
If you want to start right away, use the table below to jump to each practice question. If you’re returning to this post, skip to the important takeaways. And once you feel confident in all the areas, head over to our GRE practice test to test your knowledge!
There are three types of questions in the GRE verbal reasoning section: Reading Comprehension (RC), Text Completion (TC), and Sentence Equivalence (SE).
Magoosh has you covered! Below is a sample of GRE verbal practice questions with answers and explanations, covering not just TC, SE, and RC, but also different question types and difficulty levels within those categories.
(NOTE: We’ve provided interactive buttons for you to select your answer as you go through these questions. This way, you can keep track of your answers and check your work. However, please note that there’s no option to submit them! Also, some of these questions are taken directly from Magoosh GRE, offered here in this post for free. These questions include links to their Magoosh GRE question/answer pages, which include video and text explanations.
I’m going to let you in on a secret about GRE Reading Comprehension. Within the GRE RC question format, there are two very different question formats: regular Reading Comprehension and Paragraph Arguments.
Reading Comprehension passages are 1-4 paragraphs long and are followed by 2-4 questions. The questions in these format focus on a wide variety of passage content: author attitudes, implied ideas, stated ideas, the meaning or purpose of a given word, phrase, or sentence, and so on.
The other format is the Paragraph Argument. PA passages are always one paragraph long. The paragraphs themselves are relatively short, usually 1/3 to 1/2 the length of one the single regular RC paragraphs mentioned above. The PA question format is all about logic. PAs always put forth an argument and are followed by a single logic-oriented question. The PA questions come in six types:
These question types are described in Chris’s blog post “Types of Paragraph Argument Questions on the Revised GRE.”
Alright, let’s get started. Below, we’ll look at a Long Reading Comprehension passage and its questions followed by three Paragraph Argument questions.
In Don Giovanni, what is perhaps Mozart’s best-known opera, there exist two distinct endings, a phenomenon not entirely unknown during the composer’s time, but one that invites the obvious question: Why did Mozart decide to include alternate endings for Don Giovanni when he did not do the same with his other famous operas, Die Zauberflöte and Le Nozze di Figaro. Another question, and one not so obvious, is: Why was Mozart himself uncertain as to which of the two endings to choose, as is evidenced in his correspondence with Lorenzo Da Ponte, the opera’s librettist?
A common answer is to treat both these questions as one: Mozart was uncertain as to which ending to provide, so he wrote both endings. Such a reply ignores an important consideration: Why did Mozart decide to provide these specific endings? Libard provides a reasonable answer: The traditional ending—in the sense that it is the one that was popular during the composer’s day and continues to be so today—is clearly more palatable for audiences. The hero, Don Giovanni, is chided for his libertine ways and then the cast appears in tutti, bellowing a merry chorus as the curtain falls. The audience is left having a light dose of entertainment, which, after all, was the aim of many of the operas of Mozart’s time. Fine, but then what of the tragic ending? Libard—trading the sensible for the pat—offers little more than that such an ending reflects the political climate of the day.
This alternate ending—Don Giovanni is suddenly cast down to Hell, and instead of being redeemed, the hero emerges from the underworld chastened, and the curtain falls—was interpreted by the critics of the day as heavy-handed didacticism. While such a view is not entirely without merit—Mozart ultimately aimed to impart some lesson for his incorrigible Lothario—it still leaves the question unanswered as to why two endings and what exactly did Mozart aim to communicate that could not be housed in a traditional ending.
One answer offered recently by musicologist Gustavo Lucien is that Mozart balked at including a traditional ending, feeling that it was incongruous with the serious tone of most of the opera. Indeed, Don Giovanni falls more under the rubric of opera series than opera buffo, the latter typically featuring light endings in which the entire cast sings in an upbeat, major key. Da Ponte, however, insisted that forthwith casting Don Giovanni to Hell, and offering him scant opportunity for redemption, would likely leave the audience feeling ambivalent. Such an ending would also suggest that the librettist had been unable to think of a tidy resolution. Da Ponte, then, was not so much against a tragic ending as he was an abrupt tragic ending. Perhaps even Mozart was unsure of what to do with Don Giovanni once he was in Hell and may have even been working out a different ending, using the light ending as a stopgap till he achieved such an aim. In that case the fate of Don Giovanni can best be answered by the fact that Mozart—through debts, ill-health, and the composer’s obligation to compose works for his patrons –was unable to return to a work he had tabled.
In the context in which it is used, “tabled” most nearly means
A) considered
B) discarded
C) toiled over
D) unintentionally forgotten
E) put aside indefinitely
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answer: E) put aside indefinitely
Explanation:
We learn earlier in the paragraph that Mozart had put aside Don Giovanni hoping to come back to it once he had thought of a better ending. Therefore, in this context, ‘table’ means to put aside for later. (E), “put aside indefinitely,” is the answer.
The author of the passage would take exception to all of the following statements regarding Libard’s response to the existence of dual endings to Don Giovanni EXCEPT?
A) Libard’s explanations of Don Giovanni’s multiple endings are not uniform in their usefulness.
B) Libard offers little insight into both of the questions posed in the first paragraph.
C) Libard’s understanding of 18th century audiences is flawed.
D) Libard’s interpretation of the tragic ending to Don Giovanni has more in common with that of Lucien than with that of Lorenzo Da Ponte.
E) Libard’s views, while not entirely accurate, are consistently probing. Click here for the answer and explanation
Answer: A
Explanation:
This is a trickily worded question, which amounts to a double negative. “Take exception” means to disagree with. Because this is an EXCEPT question, the answer is something with which the author would either agree or not clearly disagree.
The author would agree with (A), because Libard offers two explanations regarding the questions posed by the author. The author considers one explanation reasonable, the other lacking. Therefore, the author would agree that Libard’s explanations are not “uniform in their usefulness.”
According to the passage, Mozart’s use of a tragic ending allowed him to accomplish which of the following?
Select ALL answers that apply.
A) He was able to teach a moral regarding wanton behavior.
B) He was able to be consistent with the conventions of the opera prevalent during his time.
C) He was able to provide a resolution that would allow audiences to feel satisfied.
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answers: A only
Explanation:
In the third paragraph, the passage says that “Mozart ultimately aimed to impart…” Therefore (A).
The passage says the traditional ending did not fit with the serious tone of the opera, and so Mozart did not use the traditional ( = non-serious) ending. Thus the tragic ending was not typical and not consistent with the conventions of the time. (B) is not correct.
(C) describes the traditional ending, not the tragic ending. (C) is incorrect.
Highlight the sentence in the passage that describes an explanation of Mozart’s contemporaries regarding the composer’s objective in choosing a tragic ending.
NOTE: This question can’t be displayed here on the blog because it requires you to scroll through the passage in a sidebar and click sentences in the passage to highlight them. This is also how it works on the real GRE! Click here to access and this question, complete with video explanation.
NOTE: By far, the most common GRE Paragraph Argument question types are: Weaken/Strengthen, Evaluate Argument, Paradox, Assumption. Those question types appear below.
Downtown Greensborough is a major financial center, in which many citizens either drive or rely on public transportation to get to work. This setup has led up to a spate in the number of pedestrians who have been struck and killed by vehicles. In an effort to curb the number of pedestrian-related fatalities, Greensborough has installed speed reduction signs at the six city intersections in which the highest numbers of fatalities have occurred in the last year. The Greensborough city government predicts that the number of pedestrian fatalities will significantly decrease once the speed reduction signs have been installed.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the validity of the conclusion?
Select the answer.
A) Some of those who drive to work in downtown Greensborough have a valid driver’s license.
B) The number of annual pedestrian fatalities outside the downtown area is far less than in the downtown area.
C) The six intersections in which the signs are installed are responsible for a majority of pedestrian deaths in downtown Greensborough.
D) The new speed reduction signs will be in neon orange and prominently placed.
E) Red light cameras, which are used to catch motorists running red lights, were installed yet the number of pedestrian fatalities did not decrease.
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answer: C
Explanation:
In this case, what the test writers are doing is anticipating a possible weakness in the argument. Essentially, they are defusing a potential objection by showing how that objection is no longer valid. For example, if someone said, “hey your argument has a gap in it because it is only based on six intersections, which isn’t the same as the entire downtown area.” The correct answer, (C), retorts, “Well, most of pedestrian deaths happen at those six intersections.”
The Green Peas Grocery Store in the remote wealthy enclave of Luxville charges more than the Green Peas Grocery Store in Oak City charges for the same items. Clearly, on any given item, the Green Peas grocery franchise is taking advantage of its location in Luxville to reap higher profits on that item.
In evaluating the argument, it would be most useful to compare
Select the answer.
A) the selection of specialty items in the Oak City location with the selection of specialty items in the Luxville location.
B) the cost of transporting merchandise to the Oak City location with the comparable cost to the Luxville location.
C) the average cost of the same or comparable items at other grocery stores in Oak City with the average cost at other stores in Luxville.
D) the percent of average household income spent on groceries in Oak City with the comparable percentage in Luxville.
E) the cost of these items in Oak City and in Luxville with the cost at other Green Peas stores throughout the state.
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answer: B
Explanation:
What we want to explain are the higher prices, for the same items, in Luxville. The argument takes a firm stand: the Luxville store is just taking advantage of its location. Implicitly, the author is saying: the Luxville store has no valid reason for charging high prices. If there were a valid reason, that would call this entire argument into question.
(B) is the credited answer. If Luxville remote, transportation to that location could be an issue, and if the additional transportation needs adds an extra cost, this would be a valid reason for charging more in the Luxville store. It would call the argument into question.
Linguist: Each language has a word that captures a concept or emotional state in a way that no other language does. To capture such a breadth of expression, an artificial language should be created that contains words corresponding to all the different concepts and emotional states captured by the world’s languages. That is not to say that such a language would contain as many words as there are in all the world’s languages. Rather, only for those words that have no corresponding word in another language. While such a plan is hugely ambitious, the resulting language would be more thorough than any existing language.
The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?
Select the answer.
A) Extinct languages do not offer up words that capture concepts and emotional states in ways that fundamentally differ from those of existing languages.
B) Many languages have words that virtually overlap in the meaning they convey.
C) Each year hundreds of the world’s languages go extinct, once there are no longer any native speakers remaining.
D) It is possible for one person to learn all of the world’s existing languages.
E) The range of concepts and emotional states is the only indication of a language’s thoroughness. Click here for the answer and explanation
Answer: E
Explanation:
The conclusion assumes that thoroughness, as it relates towards a language, can be defined as encompassing “the range of concepts and emotional states…” That is, there is nothing else that accounts for a language’s thoroughness. This leads us to (E).
(A) contrasts existing and extinct languages. Not relevant.
(B) does not relate to the discussion. On the surface, it looks like it may weaken the point but it does not do so. Even if it did, we are dealing with an assumption.
(C) is a general fact that is irrelevant.
(D) sounds like it weakens the argument, if anything.
In a certain state, over 80% of the land is made up of farms, but historically, large farm machinery has not sold well in this state. The percentage of land devoted to farms is not expected to increase. In fact, the number of farms in the state has been slowly declining over the past decade. A new manufacturer of large farm equipment is building a factory in the middle of this state, and the manufacturer’s plans for success depend on strong in-state sales of its product. Both the manufacturer and the industry analysts expect this manufacturer to be quite successful over the next few years
Which of the following, if true, most helps to provide a justification for the manufacturer’s and the industry analysts’ optimistic expectations?
Select the answer.
A) Land previously owned by small, independent farmers has been bought up and consolidated into large industrial farms, which have a much greater need of large farm equipment.
B) The manufacturer’s new factory will be on or close to five different railroad lines, and is expected to have a beneficial impact on the struggling rail transport industry in the state.
C) The percentage of food imported into the state, from other states and from other countries, has increased significantly over the past 20 years.
D) The number of models of large farm machinery this manufacturer will offer is larger than the number of models offered by most other comparable manufacturers of large farm machinery.
E) Some crops grown in this state, like corn, enjoy substantial government subsidies and find a robust market in the food processing industries.
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answer: A
Explanation:
The argument is presented in such a way that it looks like a really bad idea to buy large farm machinery. Yet analysts are expecting profits from large farm machinery.
(A) provides the justification. Notice it says that the percent of land left to farms will not increase. However, if all the small farms are being combined into large farms, then there will be a need for large machinery.
(B) is wrong because the focus of the argument is on large machinery, not the railroad industry.
(C) does not work since food imports do not relate to large farm machinery, or, for that matter, the argument itself.
(D) doesn’t answer the fundamental question: How can investors expect to profit from large farm machinery?
(E) is irrelevant. The type of crops grown is not an issue.
Text Completion questions on the GRE involve reading a prompt that is usually one sentence long, but can be 2-3 sentences long. Each prompt will have either 1, 2, or 3 blanks that need to be completed with the words or phrases in the answer choices. Single-blank Text Completion prompts have 5 answer choices per blank. TC prompts with 2 or 3 blanks have three answer choices for each blank.
The complexity of Text Completion sentences varies a lot, depending on the difficulty level. So the practice questions below cover each of the major difficulty levels needed for good GRE verbal practice: easy, medium, hard, and very hard.
The travel writer’s ______________ towards others he met on his cross-country trip most likely endeared him only to those readers with a misanthropic bent.
Select the answer.
A) diffidence
B) humility
C) cynicism
D) garrulity
E) obsequiousness
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answer: C) cynicism
Explanation:
The keywords are “endeared…misanthropic bent.” Misanthropic readers are those who have a general ill-will towards humanity. Therefore, the travel writer must be expressing some negative attitude. (C), “cynicism,” means interpreting others behavior as solely motivated by self-interest. A misanthropic person is prone to looking cynically upon the actions of others.
(A) “diffidence”, which means modesty or shyness resulting from a lack of self-confidence, does not fit the context.
(B) “humility” would not endear the writer to misanthropes.
(D) “garrulity” means talkativeness.
(E) “obsequiousness” means excessively fawning.
Unlike the performances of her youth, in which she seamlessly inhabited a role, the performances of her later years were ____________, as though she were calling out to audiences, “look how convincingly I can portray my character.”
Select the answer.
A) decrepit
B) comical
C) volatile
D) mechanical
E) contrived
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answer: E) contrived
Explanation:
The contrast is between “seamlessly inhabited” and the blank. The quotation further underscores the point that the actress’s performances were not at all natural. In this sense (E), “contrived,” works best.
With characteristic ____________, H.L. Mencken skewered the sacred cows of his time, criticizing social trends and government institutions with equal asperity.
Select the answer.
A) hauteur
B) playfulness
C) vitriol
D) civility
E) dash
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answer: C) vitriol
Explanation:
The answer is C, vitriol, and the clue here is criticizing. Sure, it helps to know what sacred cows (they are cherished beliefs) and asperity (bitterness) are, but you should still be able to come up with your own word based on criticizing. My word is criticizing-ness. I know – it is not an actual word. But, that’s the whole point – you only have to get the meaning of the blank – and the meaning of criticizing-ness is clear.
Now, let’s go through the answer choices. Hauteur may be unfamiliar to you, but you should notice it comes from the word “haughty”, which means arrogant (this is a very common GRE word, and is, in fact, used to define more difficult GRE words, such as supercilious). Arrogance isn’t quite criticizing-ness.
Next we have (B), but playfulness clearly doesn’t work. Then, we have (C) vitriol, the most difficult word of the bunch, and the GRE knows this. In fact, they are offering answer choices that kind of fit the clue, like hauteur, but not really. (D) civility is not one of these words, but (E) dash is. If you do something with dash, you do it with flair. Couldn’t you criticize something with flair? Sure. The only problem is, there is no clue – that is word or phrase – that supports dash.
Of course, knowing asperity helps. Asperity, meaning bitterness, matches up perfectly with vitriol, which means bitter criticism.
Even had you not known this, successfully eliminating three of the five answers gives you a 50-50 chance of guessing correctly. Plugging in the answer choices into the blanks, on the other hand, does not increase your odds.
An element of _________ on the part of the audience is interwoven into the multi-era saga, for two actors portraying the same character at different phases of life are distinguishable enough that the audience is able to discern differences for which the mere passing of years cannot account.
Select the answer.
A) surprise
B) foreboding
C) disbelief
D) confusion
E) predictability
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answer: C) disbelief
Explanation:
The key to unraveling this tough question is to break up the sentence into digestible parts, simplifying along the way:
“An element of _______ on the part of the audience…saga” = The is an inherent quality of the multi-era saga
“Two actors…difference” = the audience can tell how two actors playing the same character differ physically
“passing years…account” = these differences are greater than those that naturally happen when a person ages
Therefore, an inherent part of watching the multi-era saga is an element of disbelief, since the audience knows that the same character is actually played by two different people.
Were scientific advancement simply a question of the mere accumulation of facts then we have made (1) ____________ progress over the last two centuries; however, it is not sheer data alone but rather a scientist’s ability to interpret this information that accounts for the (2) ____________ breakthroughs of the last couple hundred years.
Select the answer for BLANK i.
A) inimitable
B) scant
C) evident
Select the answer for BLANK ii.
D) diligent
E) momentous
F) limited
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answers:
Explanation:
For the first blank, you probably know the definition to (B) scant and (C) evident. Do not be thrown off by (A) inimitable. For now discount it. Only if neither (B) nor (C) works should you return to (A).
Let’s assume that science has made scant progress (little progress). If that were the case, what word would fit in the second blank? You may be tempted to say ‘big’ because of the word ‘however,’ which reverses the direction of the sentence. However, the keywords, it is not sheer data alone, show that accumulated facts and scientist’s ability together create a certain type of breakthrough. Thus the two blanks are similar.
But does it make sense to assume that we have made little progress, and small breakthroughs? Notice keywords such as scientist’s ability to interpret. Clearly there is a positive connotation. That is scientists have helped science progress through their ability to interpret, not just to collect facts.
Plugging in (C) evident and (E) momentous we can see the sentence makes sense: if facts alone counted for progress then we have made obvious progress. However, momentous breakthroughs require not just facts but scientists’ ability to interpret information.
It is important to note that you should not automatically assume that the second blank is momentous. True, this is a reasonable assumption, as most would agree that science has come a long way since Darwin set sail on the Beagle. For the Text Completion, however, you must base your answer solely on the information in the Text Completion. Oftentimes, your “reasonable” assumption may backfire. That is there will be specific words in the sentence that go against your assumption. So remember—the answer to any blank will always be in the sentence.
In (i) ________ what they see as a culture so dominated by technology as to be rendered incapable of sustained introspection, the authors cast generalizations so wide that all but the hardiest Luddites will remain (ii) ________.
Select the answer for BLANK i.
A) bemoaning
B) glorifying
C) overlooking
Select the answer for BLANK ii.
D) committed
E) unconvinced
F) dispirited
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answers:
Explanation:
“Cast generalizations…” indicates that the book is unconvincing. Luddites are those who reflexively decry technology. They are the only ones who will be convinced by the authors’ over generalizations. “All but” means “except”. Therefore, all those except the Luddites will remain (E) unconvinced.
For the first blank, it would be odd to use (B) glorifying to describe how the authors would feel about a society incapable of sustained introspection. (A) bemoaning means speaking out against.
The term “rocket scientist,” as used to denote somebody of great erudition, is (i) ________ given that the last few decades has seen a flowering of vocations just as worthy of (ii) _________, and far more topical.
Select the answer for BLANK i.
A) inaccurate
B) appropriate
C) anachronistic
Select the answer for BLANK ii.
D) this exalted term
E) identification with such individuals
F) interstellar ambitions Click here for the answer and explanation
Answers:
Explanation:
“Far more topical” indicates that we are dealing with the element of time/relevance. “The last few decades” also brings out the contrast between the old–the term rocket scientist–and vocations today. Answer: (C), “anachronistic.”
The second blank is a little trickier because “this exalted term” is a strong distractor. However, it is highly intelligent individuals, not the vocations themselves, that are described as “rocket scientists”. The point of the sentence is that other, more current occupations should be used to describe highly intelligent individuals. (E), “identification with…” works best.
That we can, from a piece of art, (i) ____________ the unconscious urges of the artist—urges that remain hidden even from the artist himself—will remain a(n) (ii)______________ issue, as it is one (iii) ___________ empirical analysis: we can never definitively know what is submerged deep inside the artist’s psyche, let alone reconcile any such revelations with the artist’s work.
Select the answer for BLANK i.
A) derive
B) appreciate
C) subvert
Select the answer for BLANK ii.
D) practical
E) intractable
F) unambiguous
Select the answer for BLANK iii.
G) easily subjected to
H) not readily amenable to
I) likely to be resolved by
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answers:
Explanation:
The very last part of the sentence tells us that we can’t figure out an artist’s “unconscious urges” by analyzing his or her artwork. Therefore, (A) derive works best. When you derive something, you figure it out. (B) appreciate doesn’t really capture the sense of “figuring out/discovering”, which ties back to the clue “never definitively know”. The problem is that we have this clue: “urges that remain hidden even from the artist himself”. The word “appreciate” means “to be aware of/to recognize the quality of.” It doesn’t really fit to say that someone could “appreciate” a part of a piece of artwork that the artist himself didn’t know about. Rather, we want a word that means “extract”. The sentence is talking about people finding something hidden in a piece of art. “Appreciate” doesn’t have this connotation of “extracting” the hidden meaning.
At this point, we can figure out that deriving unconscious urges is a thorny problem. (E) intractable, which means difficult to deal with, matches this meaning nicely.
Finally, “empirical analysis” deals with testing observable, measurable phenomenon. The sentence tells us that we “never definitively know what is submerged deep inside the artist’s psyche.” How can we empirically analyze something we don’t know? In order to do an empirical analysis, we need quantifiable data. If we can’t definitely know something, we can’t have any data on it. Thus, the issue is (H) “not readily amenable to” empirical analysis, meaning it cannot be easily tested. We can’t choose (G) “easily subjected to,” which would mean the opposite: that we can indeed study and even solve the question by empirical analysis. And if we put (I) “likely to be resolved by” in the blank, we’d be saying the opposite of what we want – we’d be saying that this issue can be solved by empirical analysis, which is the opposite of what the correct answer choice says (not readily amenable to).
That the comedian was so (i) ____________ as to be unable to (ii) ____________ the effect she had on others was not lost on her audience, who quickly stood up to leave, hoping their action would at least (iii) ____________.
Select the answer for BLANK i.
A) coarse
B) oblivious
C) presumptuous
Select the answer for BLANK ii.
D) discern
E) mitigate
F) ignore
Select the answer for BLANK iii.
G) serve as an uncommon retort
H) send an unambiguous message
I) provide a cryptic counterpoint
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answers:
Explanation:
To take apart this text completion, you should try to put in your own words what is happening. The audience has walked out on the comedian, who was not able to notice the effect she was having. Notice is my own word for the second blank. The word that is the closest is (D) discern.
The first blank should be the opposite because she was “so _____ as to be unable to notice the effect.” Oblivious (B) is a good opposite.
As for the third blank, the crowd is aware that the comedian is very oblivious, and so they hope that they can finally do something so she will take notice (they choose, in this case, to walk out). They hope that “their action would send a clear message”. The answer that best matches up for the third blank is (H), “send an unambiguous message.”
To make sure that all the pieces ‘fall into place’, try plugging in those answers to see if they make sense. This final step will help you make sure that the sentence has coherent meaning. In this case (B), (D), and (H), the answers, make sense.
If you chose a different answer, say (A), (E), and (G), try plugging them into and reading the sentence. Does that make sense? If you say kind of, which is often the case with wrong answers (they kind of work), try to see if there is a different interpretation. In this case, that interpretation is the one above.
James Maxwell once remarked that the best scientists are the (i) ____________ ones; not hemmed in by the (ii) ____________ of their respective fields, they are able to approach problems with a(n) (iii) ____________ mind, so to speak.
Select the answer for BLANK i.
A) adaptable
B) revolutionary
C) ignorant
Select the answer for BLANK ii.
D) myopia
E) preconceptions
F) inertia
Select the answer for BLANK iii.
G) fertile
H) rational
I) empty
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answers:
Explanation:
Here it may be tempting to read the sentence and plug in (A), “adaptable”,” or (B), “revolutionary”. Both answers make sense. In fact, you could construct a legitimate sentence using (A) and (D) myopia/(E) preconceptions or (B) and (D)/(E). However, how would you create a coherent sentence with the third blank?
Neither fertile nor rational are really backed up by clues in the passage. Not being limited by their field’s way of thinking doesn’t quite imply a fertile mind. More likely, having a mind that is not stuck in a certain way of thinking would be one that is empty. You may argue that empty mind is too negative, but notice the words ‘so to speak.’ This is a phrase that translates to “metaphorically.”
Completing the third blank with ‘empty’ allows us to work back through the first two blanks. We want scientists with an empty mind, thus (C) ignorant works best in the first blank. From there, we can see that E is good for the second blank, since preconceptions are ideas, and if a mind is not hemmed in by preconceptions, it means it contains no limiting ideas… and a mind that doesn’t have ideas could also be described as empty.
To be ignorant of what is going on in a specific field is not to be hemmed in by the preconceptions. Scientists are free to approach a problem on their own terms, learning as they go.
Heinrich Feyermahn, in insisting that Galileo did not fully uphold the tenets of scientific rationalism, does not ____________ the Italian astronomer, but rather the very edifice of Western thought. For if Galileo is the purported exemplar of rational thinking, and yet is ____________, then the history of science cannot be understood as an endless succession of scientists carrying out their work free of all-too-human biases. Thus, Feyermahn admonishes, in faithfully chronicling the sweep of science in the last 300 years, historiographers would be ____________ not to include the human foibles that were part of even the most ostensibly Apollonian endeavors.
Select the answer for BLANK i.
A) exclusively implicate
B) partially repudiate
C) fully espouse
Select the answer for BLANK ii.
D) found wanting
E) considered enlightened
F) dismissed as inconsequential
Select the answer for BLANK iii.
G) prudent
H) remiss
I) contrarian
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answers:
Explanation:
Feyermahn finds fault with Galileo for not being completely rational, but he doesn’t place all of the blame only on Galileo. Rather, his contention is that all of scientific thought is built on human endeavor, which is susceptible to biases and therefore not entirely rational. For the first blank we want words showing that Feyermahn is not criticizing only Galileo. A), ‘Exclusively implicate’ works best.
The second sentence implies that Galileo is not perfectly rational, and thus D), ‘found wanting’, which means lacking, works best. F, ‘dismissed as inconsequential’ is too extreme. The sentence is only implying that Galileo came up short. The third sentence moves to modern chroniclers of science, who Feyermahn urges to be aware of the human weaknesses of scientists. Those writers of science who choose not to would be remiss, or negligent. I, ‘contrarian’ implies a conscious obduracy that is not supported by the context.
FAQ: Why is “partially repudiate” incorrect?
A: “Repudiate” means roughly to go against or to deny the truth or validity of something. So repudiate does kind of fit, but the word that throws everything off is the word “partially.”
Feyermahn’s criticism of Galileo’s scientific rationalism brings into question the entire foundation and history of western scientific thought:
“does not ____________ the Italian astronomer, but rather the very edifice of Western thought.”
That is a pretty big thing- it’s basically everything!
“Partially” means only a part, not the whole. For example, if you only write the introduction for your GRE essays but not the body or conclusion, you only did a part of the work. You did not do all of the work. Thus, you “partially” did the essay.
To say that Feyermahn “partially repudiated” Galileo would be to say he only questioned or denied part of Galileo. But we know from the rest of the passage that he called into question both Galileo’s entire body of scientific work and the entire historical view of western science. So partially repudiated just doesn’t fit the blank.
At long last, we arrive at GRE Sentence Equivalence questions. Before you get started, let’s talk a little about the things that make Sentence Equivalence different from Text Completion. For one thing, Sentence Equivalence questions are always short, single-blank prompts. In addition, when you fill in the blank, you select two different words that could both go in the blank. These two different words will be selected form 6 answer choices. But don’t just choose any two words that could logically complete the sentence. Instead, make sure you choose the two words that will complete the sentence and give the sentence the same meaning, no matter which word you use.
Often, this means choosing the two words that have the same definition. However, sometimes two words can have slightly different meanings, but still fill in the blank to create two sentences with the same meaning. To give a simple example of this (simpler than you’d actually see on the GRE), you can say “The mouse ran away and the cat followed it” or “The mouse ran away and the cat chased it.” “Followed” and “chased” don’t have the exact same meaning, and they can even have completely different meanings in other sentences. But in “The mouse ran away and the cat __________ it,” those two slightly different words can fill the blank to make equivalent sentences.
Finally, I’m going to give you one more inside GRE verbal practice tip that is not directly mentioned in the official GRE guide: almost every Sentence Equivalence question in GRE verbal has the same pattern of answer choices. In the 6 choices, there will likely be two words that are equivalent but incorrect, two words that have different meanings form each other and the other words and are thus incorrect, and two correct equivalent words. Often, it can be helpful to try to eliminate the non-simile pair and incorrect similes first.
Water experts predict that unless the coming year’s rainfall will be significantly above average, the city’s denizens, regardless of any protestations, will have to _____ their water usage.
Select exactly two answer choices that best complete the sentence and produce sentences that are alike in meaning.
A) curtail
B) intensify
C) administer
D) denote
E) disseminate
F) limit
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answers: A (curtail), F (limit)
Explanation:
The sentence makes clear that rain is not likely. The denizens, or inhabitants, therefore have to reduce or limit their water usage. As curtail means “to limit,” both (A) curtail and (F) limit are correct.
(B) intensify is the opposite
(C) administer does not make sense
(D) denote means to make or indicated
(E) disseminate means to spread or scatter
The heckler, hiding amongst the amorphous crowd, is the epitome of _______–as soon as he has been identified, he goes scuttling off, head down, grumbling to himself.
Select exactly two answer choices that best complete the sentence and produce sentences that are alike in meaning.
A) stealthiness
B) outspokenness
C) shyness
D) aloofness
E) cravenness
F) spinelessness
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answers: E (cravenness), F (spinelessness)
Explanation:
‘…amongst the amorphous…’ shows that when the heckler cannot be identified he hurls aggressive, inflammatory comments. As soon as he is identified, he sneaks away, ‘head down…’ These clues indicate a cowardliness about the heckler. (E) cravenness is cowardliness and (F) spinelessness connotes the same lack of courage as cravenness
(A) stealthiness is an attractive answer choice, especially with the first half of the sentence. It does not, however, capture the overall meaning of the sentence. Also, there is no similar word.
(B) outspokenness, another attractive answer choice, ignores the contrast between before the heckler is identified and after he is identified.
(C) shyness does not fit the context.
(D) aloofness means standing apart. A heckler embroils himself in possible conflict and is not aloof.
The travel writer must invite ______________ ; few, if any travelogues, have ever been inspired by a languorous afternoon poolside.
Select exactly two answer choices that best complete the sentence and produce sentences that are alike in meaning.
A) travail
B) tribulations
C) excitement
D) scandal
E) tranquility
F) serenity
Click here for the answer and explanation
Answers: A (travail), B (tribulations)
Explanation:
The second part of the sentence states that travelogues do not result from relaxing travel. Therefore, the first blank indicates a word that is opposite of relaxing. (A) and (B) both imply difficulty and challenge.
The questions in this post are a great cross-section of the formats, types, and subtypes of GRE verbal prompts you might see on test day. Bear in mind, of course, that the “cross section” mix above doesn’t lineup perfectly with the proportion of each question type on the real GRE.
Make sure you get truly acquainted with the question types you’ve practiced. Again, Magoosh can help. We have a detailed description of the subtypes of Reading Comprehension. In our complete guide to GRE Reading Comprehension, we tell you all about the different Reading Comprehension passage questions, as well as the different types of Reading Comprehension Paragraph Arguments. And we have similar complete guides for GRE Text Completion and GRE Sentence Equivalence.
As you get into GRE Verbal section practice, these tips can guide you in what to do (and what not to do!) when taking practice tests:
And of course, it’s also good to know exactly how GRE verbal fits into the test as a whole. For that, check out our “Everything you need to know” guide to the GRE and take an official ETS practice test. If you’d like additional guidance in your GRE prep, we recommend reviewing our GRE study plans and guides. Those study plans can be used in two ways: you can use them as examples for a different, personal study plan you make for yourself, or you can follow our study plans exactly. To follow our study plans to the letter, of course, you’ll need a Magoosh GRE Premium plan. To see if Magoosh might be a good GRE Prep “study buddy” for you, you can always try the Magoosh GRE 1-week free trial.
David is a Test Prep Expert for Magoosh TOEFL and IELTS. Additionally, he’s helped students with TOEIC, PET, FCE, BULATS, Eiken, SAT, ACT, GRE, and GMAT. David has a BS from the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire and an MA from the University of Wisconsin-River Falls. His work at Magoosh has been cited in many scholarly articles, his Master’s Thesis is featured on the Reading with Pictures website, and he’s presented at the WITESOL (link to PDF) and NAFSA conferences. David has taught K-12 ESL in South Korea as well as undergraduate English and MBA-level business English at American universities. He has also trained English teachers in America, Italy, and Peru. Come join David and the Magoosh team on Youtube, Facebook, and Instagram, or connect with him via LinkedIn! View all posts
